from
Teaching Scienceby John Derbyshire in the National Review
A very good and well-reasoned piece about the teaching of evolution, even though I disagree with the main conclusion that we should teach "consensus science conservatively":
What, then, should we teach our kids in high-school science classes? The answer seems to me very obvious. We should teach them consensus science, and we should teach it conservatively. Consensus science is the science that most scientists believe ought to be taught. "Conservatively" means eschewing theories that are speculative, unproven, require higher math, or even just are new, in favor of what is well settled in the consensus. It means teaching science unskeptically, as settled fact.
He makes good points in support of this, and he might be right -- but it is my strong intuition that there is a better solution.
I would elaborate, but do not have enough room here in the margin. (This comment is included for Bill's amusement.)